Nutritional profiles of world cuisines
Every cuisine has its strengths and weaknesses. Instead of a single, indefensible ranking, we measured 6 nutritional axes across 3,200+ savory recipes (desserts and snacks excluded). The result: a radar for each cuisine — a neutral footprint that you interpret according to your own goals.
Methodology — Descriptive radar, absolute thresholds
Each axis of the radar is normalized 0–100 descriptively: the higher the score, the more the cuisine contains that dimension (no good/bad judgment). Far from the center = a lot, near the center = a little. The 5 scoring axes: fiber (g/serving), protein (g/serving), protein/calorie ratio, sugar (g/serving), calories (kcal/serving). The 6th axis — total fat — is displayed for informational purposes only (saturated vs. unsaturated fats are not distinguished in our database). Strength/weakness tags use absolute thresholds (e.g., "High in fiber" = 7g+ per serving, not a relative percentile). Sodium excluded: the traceability of salt and fermented condiments (soy sauce, fish sauce, miso) varies too much between recipes. Desserts and snacks excluded. Minimum 15 recipes per cuisine. Sources: WHO (2023), HEI-2020 (USDA), EAT-Lancet.
Radar comparison — 5 iconic cuisines
Each axis shows the relative amount (0–100). Far from the center = a lot.
Total fat shown for informational purposes — saturated vs. unsaturated fats are not distinguished in this version.
Best cuisines by dimension
The top 3 for each nutritional indicator — a cuisine can excel in one area and be low in another
Fiber
Protein
Prot/cal ratio
Sugar
Calories
What the data shows
No cuisine is perfect
Every culinary tradition has strengths and weaknesses. Japanese cuisine excels in protein and prot/cal ratio. Mexican cuisine dominates in fiber (beans, corn, vegetables). Greek cuisine has a healthy lipid profile (olive oil) but the calories follow. A single ranking flattens these nuances.
Fiber as a marker of plant diversity
Cuisines rich in legumes (Mexican, Indian) and vegetables (Japanese, Vietnamese) show the best fiber scores. This is a reliable indicator of the role of plants in a culinary tradition — and a recognized protective factor against chronic diseases.
Fat ≠ unhealthy
The fat axis is shown on the radar for info but intentionally excluded from scoring and tags. Olive oil (Greece, Italy), coconut milk (Thailand, Vietnam), and nuts are beneficial fats that the HEI-2020 does not penalize. Only saturated fats count — and our database does not distinguish them yet.
The sample size matters
Profiles reflect our 3,200+ recipes, not a theoretical ideal. A cuisine with 300 recipes has a more reliable profile than one with 20. The number of recipes is indicated for each cuisine.
Profile of each cuisine
Individual radar + strengths and weaknesses
French
371 recettesItalian
307 recettesIndian
185 recettesSpanish
184 recettesChinese
174 recettesJapanese
169 recettesAmerican
167 recettesKorean
123 recettesMexican
119 recettesVietnamese
118 recettesPortuguese
100 recettesThai
97 recettesMiddle Eastern
94 recettesGreek
91 recettesGerman
89 recettesMaghrebi
63 recettesBritish
61 recettesComplete nutritional data
| Cuisine | Cal. | Prot. |
|---|---|---|
| French | 611 | 34g |
| Italian | 659 | 32.4g |
| Indian | 532 | 21.7g |
| Spanish | 624 | 35.3g |
| Chinese | 431 | 24.9g |
| Japanese | 554 | 26.8g |
| American | 679 | 32.9g |
| Korean | 522 | 26.3g |
| Mexican | 785 | 38.5g |
| Vietnamese | 664 | 31.4g |
| Portuguese | 781 | 54.1g |
| Thai | 518 | 28.9g |
| Middle Eastern | 610 | 27g |
| Greek | 617 | 27.1g |
| German | 642 | 34.8g |
| Maghrebi | 650 | 30.8g |
| British | 657 | 32.6g |
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is there no single ranking of cuisines?
How do I read the radar chart?
Are the recipes representative of traditional cuisine?
Want to cook more balanced meals?
FoodCraft adapts any recipe to your nutritional goals using AI. Try it for free.
Discover FoodCraft