MyFitnessPal vs Cronometer — 2026 Comparison

On one side, the most popular nutritional tracker in the world. On the other, the most precise tool for micronutrient tracking. MyFitnessPal and Cronometer cater to very different audiences — but which one fits your needs?

Detailed Comparison Table

FeatureFoodCraftMyFitnessPalCronometer
AI Recipe Adaptation
Photo → Instant Recipes
Smart Meal Planning
Personalized AI Nutrition Coach
Calorie Tracking
Recipe Database
Macro Tracking
Automatic Grocery List
Multi-language (14 languages)
Free Version
No Ads
Barcode Scanner
Weight Tracking

MyFitnessPal in detail

Strengths

Colossal food database. Effective barcode scanner. Ecosystem of connections (Fitbit, Garmin, Apple Health). Familiar and easy-to-access interface. Active community.

Weaknesses

Nutritional data limited to main macros. Community database sometimes imprecise. Invasive ads. No micronutrient analysis.

Cronometer in detail

Strengths

Tracking for 80+ nutrients (vitamins, minerals, amino acids). Verified and scientifically rigorous database. Ideal for health professionals and medical diets. Detailed data export.

Weaknesses

Complex and non-intuitive interface. Significant learning curve. No recipes or meal planning. Only available in English. Primarily North American database.

What if neither was enough?

MFP is too superficial, Cronometer too complex. Both share a flaw: they count what you ate, without helping you decide what to eat tomorrow. FoodCraft takes a radically different approach: AI adapts recipes to your goals before you cook.

The AI that adapts your recipes

No more manual counting or cross-referencing Excel sheets. FoodCraft adjusts every recipe to your macros automatically.

Accessible without a learning curve

Neither MFP's dated interface nor Cronometer's complexity. FoodCraft is designed for daily use without prior training.

Smart Meal Planning

Neither offer AI planning. FoodCraft generates a full week of balanced meals tailored to your goals.

Verdict

Choose MyFitnessPal for simple calorie tracking and a huge database. Choose Cronometer for medical-grade micronutrient tracking. Choose FoodCraft if you want an app that does the work for you: tailored recipes, smart planning, and nutrition handled upfront.

Nutrition simplified, not simplistic

FoodCraft combines nutritional precision with ease of use. AI handles the complexity.

Try FoodCraft for free

FAQ

Which tool is more accurate?
For micronutrient tracking (vitamins, minerals), Cronometer is unbeatable. For macro adaptation of recipes, FoodCraft is more relevant. MFP is a good compromise for general tracking.
Is Cronometer worth it for daily use?
For most users, Cronometer is overkill. It's a tool for nutrition enthusiasts or medical needs. For daily use, FoodCraft or MFP are more suitable.
Is MFP reliable for macros?
Overall yes, but the community database contains errors. Check the recurring foods in your diet. Cronometer is more reliable; FoodCraft focuses on recipe adaptation rather than logging.
Can I export my data from these apps?
Cronometer offers the best data export. MFP allows for basic export. FoodCraft focuses on the cooking experience rather than data analysis.

Read more